EPS 95 Pensioners Very IMP Information: EPS 95 Pensioners opinion on EPS 95 Pensioners Higher Pension cases Hearing in Supreme Court Every EPS 95 Pensioner Must Know

EPS 95: खुद कोर्ट की सला95 ह है कि आवेदन करके उन्हें अवगत कराया जाय कि किसी प्रकरण की सुनवाई तत्काल करने को क्यूँ उपयुक्त समझा जाये।इंसान की जिंदगी से बढ़ कर और क्या कारण हो सकता,जहाँ उम्रदराज पेंशनर्स रोजाना सतगति को प्राप्त हो रहे हों, क्या अभी तक किसी ने भी ऐसा प्रयास नहीं किया ? शायद इसीलिए हमें सिर्फ तारीख ही मिल रही हैं,हमारे प्रकरण को URGENT HEARING के लिए उचित कभी माना ही नहीं गया।इस पर किसी को कुछ कहना है तो बताए कि हमारे साथ ऐसी स्तिथि किन कारणों से हुए जा रही है।

Anil Kumar Namdeo, EPS 95 पेंशनधारक

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

F. No. /Judl.(I)/2021
20th April, 2021

CIRCULAR

In continuation of Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) dated 04.07.2020 and circular(s) issued earlier regarding mentioning of matter(s), it is hereby notified for the information of all concerned:

(a) only urgent matters will be listed for hearing w.e.f. 22.04.2021. and

(b) the Advocate-on-Record/Party-in-Person may send signed and verified mentioning-application along with synopsis containing the grounds of urgency not exceeding one page in the fresh matter only by e-mail at the email address mention.sc@sci.nic.in on working days by 1.00 PM (Monday to Friday) and by 11.30 AM (Saturday) and the same shall be processed for listing on the next to next working day, subject to availability of the concerned Bench and approval of the Competent Authority. The mentioning applications received thereafter shall be processed for listing on the working day after the next to next working day. and

(c) the Advocate-on-Record/Party-in-Person may send signed and verified mentioning-application along with synopsis containing the grounds of urgency not exceeding one page in the IA (Interlocutory Application) in pending matter and Miscellaneous Application (MA) in disposed of matter only by e-mail at the email address mention.an.sc@sci.nic.in on working days by 1.00 PM (Monday to Friday) and by 11.30 AM (Saturday) and the same shall be processed for listing on the next to next working day, subject to availability of the concerned Bench and approval of the Competent Authority. The mentioning applications received thereafter shall be processed for listing on the working day after the next to next working day, subject to availability of the concerned Bench and approval of the Competent Authority. and

(d) Matter for Urgent listed mentioning shall be considered as per the guidelines laid down in circular Number F.No. 9/Judl.(I)/2019 dated 23rd January, 2019. (Annexure -I)

Sd/-                                                                                                                           Sd/- 

(Vinod Singh Rawat)                                                                                               (Anil Laxman Pansare)

Registrar (J-II)                                                                                                         Registrar (J-I)

20.04.2021                                                                                                               20.04.2021

 

Read More

EPS-95 Pensioners Higher Pension News: EPS 95 Higher Pension Cases Supreme Court Order Dt. 15 April 2021, Supreme Court earing Order for EPS 95 Pensioners

ITEM NO.14 COURT NO.4 SECTION XI-A

(HEARING THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)

S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) Nos.8658-8659/2019

(Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 12-10-2018in WPC No.602/2015, 12-10-2018 in WPC No.13120/2015 passed by theHigh Court Of Kerala At Ernakulam)

THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION & ANR. Petitioner

(s) VERSUS

SUNIL KUMAR B & ORS. Respondent(s)

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD EPS 95 CASES ORDER DATED 15.04.2021

W.P.(C) No.369/2018 (X), W.P.(C) No.360/2018 (X), W.P.(C) No.411/2018 (X), W.P.(C) No.466/2018 (X), W.P.(C) No.804/2018 (X), W.P.(C) No.594/2018 (X), W.P.(C) No.884/2018 (X), W.P.(C) No.778/2018 (X), W.P.(C) No.874/2018 (X), W.P.(C) No.1149/2018 (X), W.P.(C) No.1167/2018 (X), W.P.(C) No.1134/2018 (X)

CONMT.PET.(C) Nos.1917-1918/2018 in C.A. Nos.10013-10014/2016 (XIV-

W.P.(C) No.1430/2018 (X), W.P.(C) No.1433/2018 (X), W.P.(C) No.1428/2018 (X), W.P.(C) No.390/2019 (X), W.P.(C) No.269/2019 (X), W.P.(C) No.875/2019 (X), W.P.(C) No.349/2019 (X), W.P.(C) No.327/2019 (X), W.P.(C) No.466/2019 (X), W.P.(C) No.352/2019 (X), SLP(C) No.16721-16722/2019 (XI-A), W.P.(C) No.512/2019 (X), W.P.(C) No.511/2019 (X), W.P.(C) No.500/2019 (X)

CONMT.PET.(C) Nos.619-620/2019 in C.A. Nos.10013-10014/2016 (XIV-A)

W.P.(C) No.601/2019 (X), W.P.(C) No.1312/2019 (X), W.P.(C) No.832/2019 (X), SLP(C) No.3289/2021 (XV), SLP(C) No.2465/2021 (XV), SLP(C) No.3287/2021 (XV), Diary No.46219/2019 (XIV), W.P.(C) No.1218/2020 (X), SLP(C) No.1366/2021 (XIV), W.P.(C) No.1459/2020 (X), W.P.(C) No.1332/2020 (X), SLP(C) No.3290/2021 (XV), W.P.(C) No.86/2021 (X), SLP(C) No.1738/2021 (XIV), SLP(C) No.1701/2021 (XIV)

Date : 15-04-2021 These petitions were called on for hearing today.

CORAM :

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH

Counsel for the Parties: Mr. K.K. Venugopal, Attorney General, Mr. Vikramjit Banerjee, ASG, Mr. Sanjay Jain, ASG, Mr. R. Balasubramanian, Sr. Adv.Ms. Ruchi Kohli, Adv., Mr. Ankur Talwar, Adv., Mr. Chinmayee Chandra, Adv., Mr. Suvesh Kumar, Adv., Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, AOR, Mr. R. Venkataramani, Sr. Adv., Mr. M. Gireesh Kumar, Adv., Mr. Ankur S. Kulkarni, AOR, Mr. Mohan Parasaran, Sr. Adv., Mr. Ashwin Kumar DS, Adv.Ms. Aditi Dani, Adv., Mr. Vishnu Kumar, Adv.Ms. Surbhi Mehta, AOR, Mr. R. Basant, Sr. Adv., Mr. Raghenth Basant, Adv.Ms. Rasna Kalkat, Adv., Mr. Vishnu Pazhangana, Adv., Mr. Akshay Sahay, Adv.Ms. Liz Mathew, AOR, Mr. P.N. Ravindran, Sr. Adv., Mr. Roy Abraham, Adv.Ms. Reena Roy, Adv.Ms. Seema Jain, Adv., Mr. Himinder Lal, AOR, Mr. Ritin Rai, Sr. Adv., Mr. Neeraj Chaudhary, Adv.Ms. Pooja Dhar, AORMs. Rashmi Verma, Adv., Mr. R. Venkataramni, Sr. Adv., Mr. Bahar U. Barqui, Adv.Mohd. Maroof, Adv., Mr. M.Z. Chaudhary, Adv., Mr. Ali Safeer Farooqi, Adv., Mr. Syed Imtiyaz Ali, Adv., 

Mr. Shadab Husain Khan, Adv.Ms. Tehsheena Z. Hussain, Adv., Mr. Aftab Ali Khan, AOR, Mr. Vijay Hansaria, Sr. Adv.Ms. Sneha Kalita, AORMs. Briti Rekha Mahanta, Adv. , Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Sr. Adv.Ms. Pooja Dhar, AOR, Mr. Shrutanjaya Bhardwaj, Adv., Mr. Dhruv Mehta, Sr. Adv., Mr. Rajesh Gupta, Adv., Mr. Harpreet Singh, Adv., Mr. Ajay Chandra, Adv., Mr. Pranjal Saran, Adv., Mr. Sumit R. Sharma, AOR, Mr. Anip Sachthey, Sr. Adv., Mr. Aditya Dhawan, Adv.Ms. Anjali Chauhan, Adv.Ms. Ria Sachthey, Adv.M/s. ARS Associates, AOR, Mr. Gopal Sankaranarayanan, Sr. Adv., Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, AOR, Mr. C.M. Sundaram Iyer, Adv., Mr. Jamshed Pesi Cama, Sr. Adv., Mr. Benny P. Thomas, Adv., Mr. Prakash Ranjan Nayak, AOR, Mr. Jayanth Muthuraj, Sr. Adv., Mr. P. S. Sudheer, AOR, Mr. Bharat Sood, Adv.,

Ms. Shruti Jose, Adv. Dr. K.P. Kylasanatha Pillay, Sr. Adv., Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, AOR, Mr. Mahesh Menon, Adv.Dr. K.P. Kylasanatha Pillay, Sr. Adv.Ms. Rashmi Singhania, AOR, Mr. Mahesh Menon, Adv., Mr. V. Chitambaresh, Sr. Adv.Dr. K.P. Kylasanatha Pillay, Sr. Adv.Ms. Rashmi Singhania, AOR, Ms. V.P. Seemandini, Sr. Adv., Mr. M.R. Anisan, Adv., Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, AORMs. Anu K. Joy, Adv., Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv., Mr. Arijit Prasad, Sr. Adv., Mr. Ardhendumauli Kumar Prasad, Adv., Mr. Meenesh Kumar Dubey, Adv., Mr. Rajivkumar, AOR, Mr. Sachin Datta, Sr. Adv., Mr. Rahul Kaushik, AOR, Ms. Bhuvneshwari Pathak, Adv.Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Adv.  , Mr. Bahar U. Barqui, Adv.Mohd. Maroof, Adv., Mr. M.Z. Chaudhary, Adv., Mr. Ali Safeer Farooqi, Adv., Mr. Syed Imtiyaz Ali, Adv., Mr. Shadab Husain Khan, Adv.Ms. Tehsheena Z. Hussain, Adv., Mr. Aftab Ali Khan, AORMd. Shahid Anwar, AOR, Mr. Zuliqar Ali Khan, Adv.Dr. Bhim Pratap Singh, Adv.Mohd. Naseem Mughal, Adv., Mr. Intakhab Alam, Adv., Mr. Devashish Bharuka, Adv.Mohd. Sadique, AORMs. Anu K. Joy, Adv., Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv., Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker, Adv., Mr. S.K. Bhargava, Adv., Mr. M.K. Pandey, Adv., Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, Adv., Mr. Umakant Mishra, Adv., Mr. Niranjan Sahu, Adv., Mr. Sibo Sankar Mishra, AOR, 

Mr. V.N. Koura, Adv.Ms. Aruna Mathur, AOR, Mr. Paramjeet Benipal, Adv., Mr. Avneesh Arputham, Adv., M/s. Arputham Aruna And Co, AOR, Mr. Akash Kakade, Adv., Mr. Somanatha Padhan, AOR, Mr. Neelmani Pant, Adv., Mr. Swetab Kumar, Adv., Mr. Mohit Paul, AOR, Mr. Kartik Nayar, Adv.Ms. Sunaina Phul, Adv., Mr. Rishab Kumar, Adv., Mr. Girijesh Pandey, Adv., Mr. Ramjee Pandey, AOR, Mr. Kafeel Ahmed, Adv., Mr. Raghvendra Shukla, Adv., Mr. Sameer Parekh, Adv., Mr. D.P. Mohanty, Adv.Ms. S. Lakshmi Iyer, Adv., Mr. Ishan Nagar, Adv., Mr. Sarthak Gaur, Adv.M/s. Parekh & Co., AOR, Mr. Keshav Mohan, Adv., Mr. R.K. Awasthi, Adv., Mr. Prashant Kumar, Adv.Ms. Ritu Arora, Adv., Mr. Santosh Kumar-I, AOR, Mr. Sunil Kumar, Adv., Mr. Raghvendra Upadhyay, Adv., Mr. Sandeep Kumar Dwivedi, Adv., Mr. Pradeep Kumar Dwivedi, Adv., Mr. Atul Khaneja, Adv., Mr. Rakesh Mishra, AORMs. Nandini Gore, Adv.Ms. Tahira Karanjawala, Adv.Ms. Natasha Sahrawat, Adv., Mr. Raghvendra Pratap Singh, Adv.M/s. Karanjawala & Co., AOR, Mr. Thampan Thomas, Adv., Mr. N.M. Varghese, Adv.Ms. Tessy Varghese, Adv., Mr. K. V. Mohan, AOR, Ms. Hetu Arora Sethi, AORMs. Lalit Mohini Bhat, Adv., Mr. Anuj Kapoor,

Adv., Mr. Abhijmanyu Verma, Adv., Mr. Rahul Jain, Adv., Mr. Anirudh Bhat, Adv., Mr. Santosh Krishnan, Adv.Mohd. Sadique, AORMs. Anu K. Joy, Adv., Mr. Alim Anvar, Adv., Mr. S. K. Bhattacharya, AOR, Mr. L.K. Paonam, Adv.Ms. Tomthinnganbi Koijam, Adv., Mr. Niraj Bobby Paonam, Adv., Mr. A.P. Singh, Adv.Ms. Neetica Sharma, Adv.M/s. M. V. Kini & Associates, AOR, Mr. Rishabh Sancheti, Adv.Ms. Padma Priya, Adv., Mr. Anchit Bhandari, Adv.Ms. Shreya Gupta, Adv., Mr. K. Paari Vendhan, AOR, Mr. Mohit Rohatgi, Adv., Mr. Rajendra Dangwal, Adv., Mr. Kaustub Narendran, Adv., Mr. Syed Jafar Alam, AOR, Mr. Manoj V. George, Adv., Mr. Shifaz R. Dheen, Adv., Mr. K. Panmei, Adv.Ms. Shilpa Liza George, AOR, Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Adv.Ms. Ikshita Singh, Adv., Mr. Gunnam Venkateswara Rao, AORDr. Ashwani Bhardwaj, AOR, Mr. Vinay Bhardwaj, Adv., Mr. Romil Pathak, Adv.Ms. Anushka Sharda, Adv., Mr. Rohit Ghosh, Adv.M/s. Khaitan & Co., AOR, Mr. Varinder Kumar Sharma, AOR, Mr. Shantanu Sharma, Adv.Ms. Deeksha Gaur, Adv., Mr. Puneet Taneja, AOR, Mr. Adarsh Tripathi, Adv., Mr. Manmohan Singh, Adv.Ms. Laxmi, Adv. , Mr. Tabrez Malawat, Adv., Mr. SPM Tripathi, Adv., Mr. V.K. Shukla, Adv., Mr. Sugam Mishra, Adv.Ms. Swagoti Batchas, Adv., Mr. Satish Kumar, AOR, Mr. Arvind Gupta, AOR, Mr. Rakesh Sinha, Adv.Md. Ghulam Akbar, Adv., Mr. Jeemon Raju K., Adv., Mr. Avinash Singh, Adv., Mr. P. A. Noor Muhamed, AORMs. Giffara S., Adv., Mr. Bilal Niamathulla, Adv.Ms. Ruxana P.N., Adv., Mr. R.R. Kumar, Adv., Mr. Amrendra Kumar, Adv.Ms. Manjula Gupta, AOR, Mr. Raghenth Basant, Adv.Ms. Rasna Kalkat, Adv.Ms. Liz Mathew, AOR, Mr. R. Anand Padmanabhan, Adv.Debarati Sadhu, Adv., Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, AOR, Mr. Lakshmeesh S. Kamath, AOR, Mr. Abhay Singh, Adv., Mr. Y. Rajagopala Rao, AOR, Mr. K. Pramod Kumar, Adv., Mr. Rohan Thawani, Adv.Ms. Pooja Dhar, AORMs. Madhumita Bhattacharjee, AOR, Mr. Atanu Saikia, Adv., Mr. Anand Varma, AOR,

Ms. Astha Ahuja, Adv., Mr. Himanshu Gupta, Adv., Mr. Manoj C. Mishra, AOR, Mr. Prakash Ranjan Nayak, AOR, Mr. Gaurav Kumar, Adv.Eshna Kumar, Adv., Mr. Siddharth Mittal, AORMs. Sangeeta Bharti, Adv., Mr. Sushil Kumar Singh, AOR, Mr. Ankit Goel, AOR, Mr. R.K. Gupta, Adv., Mr. R.K. Kapoor, Adv., Mr. Rajat Kapoor, Adv.Ms. Kheyali Singh, AOR, Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Adv., Mr. Chander Shekhar Ashri, AOR, Mr. Ajit Pudussery, AOR, Mr. Ashish Rana, AOR, Mr. Anil Nag, AOR, Mr. Rahul Pratap, AORMrs.  Lalita Kaushik, AOR, Mr. Jagjit Singh Chhabra, AOR, Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar, AOR, Mr. Y. Raja Gopala Rao, AOR Ms. Bharti Tyagi, AOR, Mr. Siddharth, AOR, Mr. Preet Pal Singh, AORMs. Vandana Sehgal, AOR, Mr. Anand Dilip Landge, AOR, Mr. Udayaditya Banerjee, AOR, Mr. Purushottam Sharma Tripathi, AOR.

CODE A

UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following

ORDER

List on 22.04.2021.

(MUKESH NASA)                                                    (VIRENDER SINGH)

COURT MASTER                                                      BRANCH OFFICER

 

Read More

EPS 95 Pensioners Higher Pension News: Very Important Information for 65 Lakh EPS 95 Pensioners, Supreme Court Higher Pension Cases Order

EPS 1995 पैंशन वाद पर बहस करने के लिये केवल दो ही मुद्दे है तीसरा नही अत: बहस कम से कम आधा दिन व अधिकतम् दो दिन हो सकती है। EPS 1995 पैंशन योजना केवल अंशदान पर आधारित है अत: नियोक्ता 8.33% के अनुसार जितना अंशदान , EPFO के द्वारा संचालित पैंशन फण्ड मे जमा करायेगा, उसी के अनुरूप EPFO पैंशन निर्धारित करेगी , केन्द्र सरकार का अंशदान 1.67% होगा।

अब आता हू बिन्दू संख्या एक जिस पर बहस होनी है, वह है 31/5/2017 की ऐडवाइजरी। सुप्रिम कोर्ट निर्णय दिनाक 4/10/2016 सीधे लागू नहि हुऐ ओर न ही EPFO ने दिनाक 23/3/2017 के आदेश सीधे जारी किये।सुप्रिम कोर्ट के उक्त निर्णय  पर पांच संस्थाओ मे मंथनो पश्चात निर्देश जारी किये, जारी निर्देशो की अनुपालना करते हुये ही EPFO ने दिनाक 23/3/2017 को आदेश जारी किये।

जब कि EPFO ने  बिना किसी उक्त संस्थाओ की स्वीकृती के अपने स्तर पर दिनाक 31/5/2017 की ऐडवाइजरी जारी की जिसे KHC ने अपास्त कर दिया। सुप्रिम कोर्ट 31/5/2017 की ऐडवाइजरी को अपास्त ही रखेगा क्यो कि अपास्त नही करने पर उक्त पांच संस्थाओ के अस्तीत्व पर प्रश्न चिन्ह लग जायेगा जिसमे सम्बन्धित मंत्रालय भी सम्मीलित है । उक्त तर्क के आधार पर बहस मे दम नही है अत: सुनवाई कितनी देर चलेगी?

दूसरा बिन्दू GSR No. 609 है जिस पर बहस होनी है GSR No. 609, GOI का एक Policy matter है जिसे KHC ने अपास्त कर दिया। केन्द्र सरकार की कार्यप्रणाली केवल Policy matter पर आधारित है क्यो कि किसी भी कार्य को करने से पहले GOI के द्वारा सम्बन्धित Policy matter बनाया जाता है तत्पश्चात उस पर कार्यवाही सूनिश्चित की जाती है बिना Policy matter के कोई कार्य सम्पादन नही होता  ऐसी स्थिति मे KHC के द्वारा GSR No. 609 को अपास्त करना GOI को कार्यवाही करने से रोकना है, यदि सुप्रिम कोर्ट KHC के निर्णय को यथावत रखती है तो कल दूसरी Policy को भी निरस्त करने के लिये कोर्ट मे वाद दायर होना निश्चित है अत: सुप्रिम कोर्ट विषम परिस्थितियो को ध्यान मे रखते हुऐ GSR No. 609 को पुन: यथावत जारी रखने के आदेश जारी कर सकती है। बहस मे दम है अत: सुनवाई एकाध दिन चल सकती है।

 

Read More

EPS 95 PENSIONER CASE STATUS 13.04.2021: Good News for 65 Lakh EPS 95 Pensioners from Supreme Court EPS 95 Cases Considered for Hearing

EPS 95 HIGHER PENSION CASES ORDER BELOW

Mr. M. Chockalingam, Petitioner in WP (C) No. 233/2018

After hearing all miscellaneous matter, SC took up Item 1 of Regular matters which is NOIDA Vs KENDRIYA KARAMCHARI SEHKARI G.N.SAMITI. After hearing Item 1 partly, Justice Mr. Lalit said, DAICHII mater will take 4 days of Non Miscellaneous Days (ie) 2 days in this week & 2 in the next week. and as the roster will be changed from 26.4.21, he would take up the Item 1 again on 22.4.21 (Thursday).

Therefore, EPS 95 Pensioners cases will likely to be listed only after 27 April 21. Bench also may be different.

We may come to know the date of next hearing only by today evening. Regarding bench, we will come to know later.

M. Chockalingam

 

Read More

EPS 95 Pensioners Higher Pension Cases: Supreme Court Office Report dt 12.4.2021 EPS'95 Cases See Now

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 50857 OF 2021

(Application for Intervention filed by Ms. Shilpa Liza George, Adv. in SLP Nos. 16721-22 of 2019)

THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT ORGANISATION & ANR                                          Petitioners

Versus

SUNIL KUMAR & ORS                                                                                                       Respondents

OFFICE REPORT

SLP NOS. 8658-59 OF 2019

The Special Leave Petition above mentioned along with connected matters were listed before the Hon’ble Court on 25.03.2021, when the Court was pleased to pass the following order:- 

“ List on 13.04.2021.” 

It is submitted that pursuant to this Hon’ble Court order dated 25.02.2021 Show cause notice was issued to all the respondents in both the matters through registered A.D. Post as well as through counsel for the petitioners.

SLP 8658-8659 OF 2019

It is submitted that Mr. Siddharth Advocate, has on 12.03.2021 filed Affidavit of proof of service in respect of all the respondents.

It is further submitted that Mr. Shashi Bhushan Kumar Advocate has on 15.03.2021 filed an application for Impleadment to implead the applicants as party respondents alongwith Vakalatnama/appearance. The application is registered as Interlocutory Application Nos. 39304 of 2021(copy of the application has been included in the paper books for the kind perusal of the Hon’ble Court).

Click Here to Download Complete Supreme Court Office Report

It is further submitted that Mr. K.V. Mohan, Advocate has on 17.03.2021 filed an application for Impleadment to implead the applicants as party respondents alongwith Vakalatnama/appearance. The application is registered as Interlocutory Application Nos. 41095 of 2021(copy of the application has been included in the paper books for kind perusal of the Hon’ble Court). It is further submitted that Mr. Udaya Aditya Banarjee, Advocate has on 17.03.2021 filed an application for Intervention on behalf of applicants to intervene in SLP Nos. 8658-59 of 2019 alongwith vakalatnama/appearance. The application is registered as Interlocutory Application Nos. 41103 of 2021 (copy of the application have been included in the paper books for the kind perusal of the Hon’ble Court).

 

It is also submitted that pursuant to Hon'ble Court's order dated 25.02.2021, Mr. A. Venayagam Balan, Advocate has on 17.3.2021 filed written submission on behalf of respondent and copy of the same has been included in the paper books for kind perusal of the Hon’ble Court.

It is submitted that Mr. Purushottam Sharma Tripathi, Advocate has on 18.3.2021 and 19.3.2021, filed the Application for Impleadment to implead the applicants as party respondents alongwith Vakalatnama/appearance and he has also filed written submission on behalf of the Impleading Applicant. The same is registered as I. A. No. 42841/21(SLP 8658-59 of 2019) and copy of the same are being circulated for the kind perusal of Hon’ble Court.

It is further submitted that Mr. Anand Dilip Landge, Advocate has on 19.03.2021 filed an application for Impleadment to Implead the applicants as party respondents alongwith Vakalatnama/appearance. The application is registered as Interlocutory Application No. 42760 of 2021(copy of the application has circulated been included in the paper books for the kind perusal of Hon’ble Court).

It is further submitted that Mr. P. S. Sudheer, Advocate has on 20.03.2021 filed an application for Intervention on behalf of applicants to intervene in SLP Nos. 8658-59 of 2019 alongwith Vakalatnama/appearance. The application is registered as Interlocutory Application Nos. 43083 of 2021 (copy of the application is being circulated for kind perusal of the Hon’ble Court.

It is further submitted that Mr. Udaya Aditya Banarjee, Advocate has on 19.03.2021 filed Compliance of order short notes dated 25.2.21 in I.A. no, 41103/21 and in 16721-22/21 on behalf of applicants to intervene in SLP Nos. 8658-59 of 2019 alongwith vakalatnama/appearance. The same are being circulated for kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court.

It is further submitted that Mr.A.V. Balan, Advocate has on 20.03.2021 filed counter affidavit on behalf of Respondents copy of the counter is being circulated for kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court.

It is submitted that Mr. Siddharath Advocate for petitioner has on 22.03.2021 filed some miscellaneous documents Copies of Employees Provident Fund Act of 1952, Employees Pension Scheme, 1995, and Employees Provident Fund Scheme, 1995 (Copies of the same are being circulated for the kind perusal of Hon'ble Court).

It is further submitted that Mr. Siddharath, advocate has on 22.02.2021 filed an application for permission to submit additional documents and compilation of additional judgment on 22.03.2021 Copies of the same are being circulated for kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court.

It is lastly submitted that Mr. Siddharath Advocate has on 22.03.2021 filed Rejoinder Affidavit on behalf of the Petitioners Copy of the Rejoinder Affidavit is being circulated for the kind perusal of Hon'ble Court.

SLP NOS. 16721-22 OF 2019

It is submitted that Mr. Raj Bahadur Yadav, Advocate, has on 13.03.2021 filed Affidavit of proof of service in respect of all the respondents.

It is further submitted that Mr. Himinder Lal, Advocate has on 27.02.2021 and 18.03.2021 filed applications for Impleadment to implead the applicants as party respondents alongwith Vakalatnama/appearance. The applications are registered as Interlocutory Application Nos. 30697, 30703 and 41820 of 2021 Copies of the applications have been included in the paper books for kind perusal of the Hon’ble Court.

It is further submitted that Mr. Prakash Ranjan Nayak, Advocate has on 09.03.2021 filed an application for Intervention/Impleadment to implead the applicants as party respondents alongwith Vakalatnama/appearance. The applications is registered as Interlocutory Application Nos. 36482 of 2021, Copy of the application has been included in the paper books for kind perusal of the Hon’ble Court.

It is further submitted that Mrs. Liz Mathew, Advocate has on 17.03.2021 filed an application for Impleadment to implead the applicants as party respondents alongwith Vakalatnama/appearance. The applications is registered as Interlocutory Application Nos. 41144 of 2021Copy of the application has been included in the paper books for the kind perusal of Hon’ble Court).

It is further submitted that Mr. Prakash Ranjan Nayak, Mr. P. S. Sudheer, Ms. Rashmi Singhania, Advocates have on 17.3.2021 and 18.03.2021 filed written submissions on behalf of Impleading Applicants, respondent Copy of the same have been included in the paper books for the kind perusal of the Hon’ble Court.

It is further submitted that Ms. Rashmi Singhania, Advocate has on 17.03.2021 filed Counter affidavit on behalf the proposed respondents. Copy of the counter affidavit has been included in paper books for the kind perusal of the Hon’ble Court.

It is submitted that Mr. Himinder Lal, Advocate has on 18.03.2021 filed an Application for Impleadment to implead the applicants as party respondents alongwith Vakalatnama/appearance. The application is registered as Interlocutory Application No. 41820 of 2021 in SLP 16721-22 of 2021(copy of the application is being circulated for kind perusal of the Hon’ble Court).

It is submitted that Mr. Nishe Rajen Shonker , Advocate has on 19.03.2021 filed an Application for Direction. The application is registered as Interlocutory Application No. 42543 of 2021 in SLP 16721-22 of 2021 Copy of the application is being circulated for kind perusal of the Hon’ble Court.

It is submitted that Mr. Mohd. Saddique T.A. Advocate has on 19.03.2021 filed Applications for Impleadment to Implead the applicants as party Respondents and he has also filed Application for Directions. The application are registered as Interlocutory Application No. 42603 & 42704 of 2021 and I.A. Nos. 42696 & 42840 of 2021 respectively in SLP 16721-22 of 2021 Copies of the applications are being circulated for the kind perusal of the Hon’ble Court.

It is submitted that Mrs. Liz. Mathew, Advocate has on 20.03.2021 filed an Application for Impleadment to implead the applicants as party respondents alongwith Vakalatnama/appearance. The application is registered as Interlocutory Application No. 43183 of 2021, Copy of the application is being circulated for kind perusal of the Hon’ble Court.

It is submitted that Mrs. Vandana Sehgal, Advocate has on 22.03.2021 filed Application for Impleadment to Implead the applicants as party Respondents and Application for Directions. The applications are registered as Interlocutory Application No. 43501 & 43510 of 2021 Copies of the applications are being circulated for kind perusal of Hon’ble Court.

It is submitted that Mr. Himinder Lal, Advocate has on 22.03.2021 filed an Application for Impleadment to implead the applicants as party respondents alongwith Vakalatnama/appearance. The application is registered as Interlocutory Application No. 43526 of 2021Copy of the application is being circulated for the kind perusal of Hon’ble Court.

It is lastly submitted that Ms. Shilpa Liza George, Advocate has on 8.4.2021 filed an application for Intervention to intervene. The application is registered as Interlocutory Application No. 50857/21 Copy of the application have been included in the paper books for the kind perusal of the Hon’ble Court.

The matters alongwith applications above-mentioned are listed before the Hon’ble Court with this office report. 

Dated this the 12th day of April, 2021

Sd

ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Read More

Good News For Pensioners, Employees: महंगाई भत्ते (DA), महंगाई राहत (DR) को लेकर कर्मचारियों, पेंशनधारकों के लिए बड़ा लाभ?

केंद्र सरकार के कर्मचारी महंगाई भत्ते (DA) का बेसब्री से इंतजार कर रहे हैं, जो जनवरी 2021 तक वापस आ गया था। अखिल भारतीय उपभोक्ता मूल्य सूचकांक (AICPI) के आंकड़ों के अनुसार, कम से कम 4 प्रतिशत DA बढ़ोतरी की उम्मीद की जा सकती है। जनवरी से जून 2021 की अवधि के लिए। लेकिन, डबल बोनस भी है क्योंकि केंद्र को 1 जुलाई से डीए बहाल करने की उम्मीद है क्योंकि उन्होंने डीए बढ़ोतरी को रोक दिया है। यह सेवानिवृत्त केंद्र सरकार के कर्मचारियों के लिए भी अच्छी खबर होगी क्योंकि उनके महंगाई राहत (डीआर) का लाभ भी कम से कम बहाली के साथ बहाल हो जाएगा। उस स्थिति में, यह लगभग 52 लाख केंद्र सरकार के कर्मचारियों और केंद्र सरकार के लगभग 60 लाख पेंशनभोगियों के लिए अच्छी खबर होगी।

DA बहाली के बाद, केंद्र सरकार के कर्मचारीयों को मौजुदा 17 प्रतिशत से 28 प्रतिशत (17 + 3 + 4 + 4) से बढ़ोतरी हो सकती है। इसमें जनवरी से जून 2020 के लिए घोषित 3 प्रतिशत DA, जुलाई से दिसंबर 2020 के लिए घोषित 4 प्रतिशत DA और जनवरी से जून 2021 तक 4 प्रतिशत DA की उम्मीद है।

7th Pay Commission Latest News: Big benefit on Dearness Allowance (DA), Dearness Relief (DR)

जैसा कि केंद्र सरकार के कर्मचारियों के वेतन का निर्धारण फिटमेंट फैक्टर (जो 2.57) है, को मूल वेतन प्लस डीए से गुणा किया जाता है। जब डीए 17 से 28 प्रतिशत तक बढ़ जाएगा, तो एक केंद्रीय सरकारी कर्मचारी का वेतन कूदने के लिए बाध्य होगा। इसके अलावा, उन्हें डीए बकाया की तीन किस्तें भी दी जाएंगी।

60 लाख पेंशनरों के लिए DR का लाभ

केंद्रीय सरकारी कर्मचारियों की तरह, 60 लाख पेंशनभोगियों को भी DR बहाली का लाभ मिलेगा क्योंकि उनकी पेंशन उसी तरह से बढ़ेगी जिस तरह से एक केंद्रीय सरकारी कर्मचारी का वेतन बढ़ेगा। DA की घोषणा के बाद, उनका DR ऊपर जाएगा और उस स्थिति में, उनकी मासिक पेंशन बढ़ेगी और उन्हें अपने DR की तीन किस्तों के लिए एरियर भी मिलेगा।

 

 

Read More

EPS 95 PENSIONERS NEWS TODAY: NAC Submitted Memorandum in the name of Hon.Prime Minister and Chairman CBT handed over to RPFC

National Agitation Committee:-

 Protest Day Dtd.06.04.2021

At RPFC office Akola (Maharashtra) in the *presence and Guidance of Hon.NAC Chief alongwith Central NAC Team

Slogans shouted.

Copy of Abeyance order Dtd.20.03.2021 and Statement of Labour Secretary submitted to Hon. Parliamentary Committee burnt. 

Copy of Memorandum in the name of Hon.Prime Minister and Chairman CBT handed over to RPFC.

Receipt of RPFC office obtained.

Read More

EPS 95 HIGHER PENSION EPFO CIRCULAR: National Agitation Committee, Odisha Branch Hon. Shri B.C Nayak, state President Handed over the memorandum to PM through EPFO

National Agitation Committee, Odisha Branch Hon. Shri B.C Nayak, state President, Hon. Shri Deepak Kumar Sahu, state Vice President, Hon.Shri Sarbeswar Khilar, State co-ordinator and Hon.Shri Sarbeswar Pal state secretary Handed over the memorandum in the name of Hon.Prime Minister through ACPFC, Bhubaneswar and obtained the receipt of office.

Copy of Abeyance letter dtd.20.3.2021 was also Burnt with Slogans.

Read More

EPS 95 PENSIONERS NEWS TODAY: EPS 95 पेंशनधारकों पर ईपीएफओ के अन्याय के विरोध में राष्ट्रीय संघर्ष समिति का देशव्यापी विरोध प्रदर्शन आज

राष्ट्रीय संघर्ष समिति मंगलवार को कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि संगठन के खिलाफ देशव्यापी विरोध प्रदर्शन करने जा रही है। 20 मार्च 2021 के ईपीएफओ पत्र की एक प्रति जलाकर विरोध प्रदर्शन किया जाएगा।

EPS- 95 के राष्ट्रीय संघर्ष समिति के राष्ट्रीय अध्यक्ष कमांडर अशोक राउतजी ने कहा, “एक तरफ, माननीय प्रधान मंत्री ने खुद हमें ईपीएस -95 पेंशनरों की उचित मांगों को मंजूरी देने के लिए 4.3.2020 पर सीधा आश्वासन दिया है। उन्होंने संबंधित मंत्री को उचित समाधान के निर्देश भी दिए हैं। साथ ही सभी आंदोलन वापस लेने की सलाह दी गई है और उसी सलाह के अनुसार राष्ट्रीय संघर्ष समिति, बुलढाणा (महाराष्ट्र) के मुख्यालय में पिछले 834 दिनों से क्रमिक अंशन को छोड़कर सभी आंदोलन वापस ले लिए गए हैं, लेकिन दूसरी ओर कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि संगठन ने अन्याय के मार्ग में कोई कसर नहीं छोड़ी और पेंशन धारकों के खिलाफ अत्याचार जारी है।

EPFO का परिपत्र दिनांक 23 मार्च 2017, जिसमें उच्चतम न्यायालय के दिनांक 4 अक्टबर 2016 के आदेश में उच्च पेंशन देने का आदेश दिया गया है, उस सर्कुलर को सर्वोच्च न्यायालय को दिए बिना, पूर्ववर्ती रूप से ईपीएफओ की तिथि निर्धारित की गई है। 20 मार्च 2021 के आदेश के अनुसार, इसे अमल में लाने से दूर रखा गया है।

EPFO ​​ने सुप्रीम कोर्ट के अटॉर्नी जनरल को पेंशन संबंधी मामलों के संबंध में सही जानकारी नहीं दी। साथ ही श्रम पर संसदीय समिति को श्रम सचिव द्वारा सही तथ्यों, अनुचित मुद्दों को प्रस्तुत किए बिना प्रस्तुत करना, आदि शामिल है।

उपरोक्त सभी मुद्दों पर विचार करते हुए, देशव्यापी स्तर पर EPFO के सभी कार्यालयों में EPFO के अन्यायपूर्ण कृत्यों का विरोध करते हुए सच्चाई क्या है? पेंशन की सही जानकारी और भावनाओं को भारत के माननीय प्रधान मंत्री / मुख्य न्यायाधीश के सामने लाया जा सकता है, इसलिए ये विरोध कार्यक्रम देश के EPS- 95 पेंशनरों द्वारा किया जा रहा है।

यह ज्ञात होना चाहिए कि कोरोना महामारी के कारण, EPS 95 पेंशनधारक शासन / प्रशासन के सभी नियमों को ध्यान में रखते हुए इस "विरोध कार्यक्रम" में भाग लेंगे। दिनांक 06 एप्रिल 2021 इस विरोध दिवस के कार्यक्रम में, तथाकथित पत्र दिनांक 20 मार्च 2021 की एक प्रति जलाई जाएगी, और मा. प्रधानमंत्री के नाम ज्ञापन संबंधित EPFO कार्यालयों में दिया जाएगा।

EPS 1995 पेंशनधारकों के मांगें इस प्रकार हैं

1. न्यूनतम मासिक पेंशन रु. 7500 और महंगाई भत्ता दिया जाना चाहिए।

2. कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि संगठन का अंतरिम पत्र 31 मई 2017 को  वापस ले ली जाए और पेंशनरों को EPS 1995 पेंशनधारकों को सर्वोच्च न्यायालय के आदेश के अनुसार, उच्च पेंशन का विकल्प दिया जाना चाहिए।

3. सभी ईपीएस -95 पेंशनरों और उनके जीवनसाथी को मुफ्त चिकित्सा सुविधा प्रदान की जानी चाहिए।

4. सेवानिवृत्त कर्मचारी जो EPS- 95 योजना के सदस्य नहीं हैं, उन्हें ब्याज के साथ योगदान की वसूली करके और उन्हें बकाया राशि का उचित भुगतान करने की अनुमति देकर पूर्व पद सदस्यता दी जानी चाहिए अन्यथा उन्हें रु. 5000 की पेंशन राशि प्रति माह तय किया जा सकता है।

Read More