Thursday, June 3, 2021

EPS 1995 Higher Pension Cases with the issue of hike of minimum pension as an Urgent Matter During the Vacation and Complete Justice

3rd June 2021 

By email /speed post

For personal kind attention

To 

Sri N V Ramana 

The hon'ble chief justice of India , New Delhi 

Sub: Sincere Request for taking up the EPS 1995 cases with the issue of hike of minimum pension as an URGENT MATTER DURING THE VACATION AS A SUE MOTO CASE and COMPLETE JUSTICE AT THE

EARLIEST kindly sought for all the retirees over the range of meagre pension , found to be FEROCIOS under the provident fund Act , reg .


Respected sir , 

With very humble request before the hon'ble supreme court , it is submitted that there are about 67 lakhs of EPS 95 pensioners among whom the issue is of higher pension on actual wages and it's APPLICABILITY to exempted companies with other issues , the cases of which are to be heard by the hon'ble supreme court that relates to crores of in service employees too for their life security after retirement and rest of other cases that ACCOUNT IN MAJORITY drawing the pension in the range of less than Rs 1000 and about Rs 2800 , even on revision of pension when takes place , or otherwise , being non- beneficiaries of higher pension , due to insufficient Pensionable service unaccounted of the period of family pension scheme 1971 for which Petitions have been submitted to the hon'ble supreme court by number of EPS pensioners/Associations ALSO NEED JUSTICE BY HIKE OF MINIMUM PENSION to meet the present minimum cost of livelihood . What is the average minimum cost of livelihood in present days is not an unknown fact and also very much known to the hon'ble govt .But it is , for sure that the demand made for hike of minimum pension is certainly not much but in fact low just to survive life not totally depending on others . They are going unnoticed disregarding what has been contributed by these retired employees while in service that has built up and helped the growth of the nation what it looks to day . How long and how much they could pour out their sorrows other than with tears before the hon'ble govt speaks what not !


THE MANAGEMENT OF THE COST OF LIVELIHOOD MAINTENANCE DOES MATTER PRIMARILY to the EPS pensioners . What matters to these senior citizens is not touching the hearts of the concerned authorities .

A) Two terms are made for definition of pensionable service .One pensionable service that includes the period family pension scheme 1971 and another that accounts post EPS 1995 service as pensionable service is taken in total for grant of 2 service weightages on completion of 20 years as per the circular reference no pension /7915 dated 22/25-7-2016 of Sri S K Takhur , Addl central P F commissioner -1 (pension) EPFO new Delhi .

 B) The term of pensionable service that includes the service of family pension scheme 1971 is also held to be accountable for determination of pension as per the judgement of National consumer disputes redress-al commission ( N C D R C) new Delhi in case  of Subash Chandra Banerjee case petition no 1563 of 2009 on 21-10-2016.


C) But the EPFO takes only post period of service of EPS 1995 as pensionable service defined for determination of pension that reduces the quantum of benefit of pension in case of the retirees of early period of EPS 1995 . 

D) The pension is not indexed with living cost remaining stagnant throughout .

E) No annual relief / revision has been provided for the past more than 20 years 

All the above factors A to E have contributed for the present situation to the EPS 95 pensioners who have been demanding for hike of minimum pension indexed with cost of living to bear the present cost of minimum life .


The definition of the term of Pensionable service needs to be determined logically and scientifically in the context of two definitions framed for pensionable service .

Therefore the hon'ble supreme court may kindly address the issue the hike of minimum pension applicable to all the retirees to be provided inclusive of non pensioners as a Sue moto case urgently at the earliest date in a humanitarian gesture , ALONG WITH THE EPS 95 CASES posted for hearing to have AN UNISON EQUALITY OF JUSTICE that settles the matter as a whole in respect of all the pensioners in order that no one gets denied of justice kindly not ignoring the position the pensioners have as stated below .


THE PENSION OF EPS 1995 THAT PUT THE PENSIONERS

AT THE MERCY OF OTHERS HAS BEEN FOISTED BRINGING UNIMAGINED STRESS OF DISURPTION OF PERSONAL FAMILY LIFE WITH IT'S DEEP IMPACT ON THE PENSIONERS DEPRIVING NORMAL LIFE WHAT THEY HAD WHILE IN SERVICE IN TOTAL CONTRAST TO THE SYSTEM OF GOVT PENSION WHEREIN MINIMUM PENSION OF RS 8500 IS PROVIDED FOR SERVICE OF 15 YEARS THAT TOO WITHOUT ANY CONTRIBUTION TO THE GOVT ! ! ! WHAT A MAN- MADE CURSE IT IS !

THE LIFE OF THE EPS 1995 PENSIONERS DRAWING PENSION IN THE RANGE THAT DOES NOT SERVE ITS PURPOSE FOR SURVIVAL WITHOUT HELP OF OTHERS WOULD BE TURMOIL UNTIL THE MATTER IS SETTLED . UNFORTUNATE THAT THE POOR AND VERY POOR RETIREES DEPENDING ON OTHERS FOR LIFE MAINTENANCE ARE THE WORST AFFECTED AROUSING PITY AND AWESOME VULNERABILITY .


Having worked in Boards , corporations , big or small industries/ factories on day and night work shift while in service without normal sleep against the nature at the cost of health , now have had to live to see this situation of worrying for the cost of minimum livelihood maintenance after service .

IN ORDER OF QUALITATIVE PENSION SYSTEM , INDIA STANDS AT RANK 32 WITH 45.8 INDEX SCORE -2019 AMONG 37 COUNTRIES OF THE WORLD INCLUDED IN THE INDEX OF PENSION SYSTEM INDICATORS WHEREBY IT NEEDS IMPROVEMENT OBVIOUSLY

FOR BETTERMENT OF THE PRESENT PENSION SCHEME WITH IT'S SUSTAINABILITY FOR ENSURING SOCIO- ECONOMIC SECURITY WITH HUMAN DIGNITY OF THE RETIREES IN LIFE TIME . LIFE THAT LASTS TO IT'S END IS TO BE LIVED BALANCING LIFE AND LIVILIHOOD , FACED WITH PRESENT COST OF LIVILIHOOD . MINIMUM ECONOMIC SUPPORT IS ESSENTIAL TO BALANCE LIFE AND LIVILIHOOD .


  THE PENSION IS OXYGEN INCOME FOR THE RETIREES WHO ARE TOTALLY DEPENDENT ON IT . DEPENDENCE IS DEATH . SO IT IS THE LIABILITY OF THE EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION AND THE HONBLE UNION LABOUR MINISTRY TO TAKE CARE OF THE LIVILIHOOD OF PENSIONERS WITH THEIR HEALTH CARE AGAINST THE EMPLOYER'S CONTRIBUTION TO THE PENSION FUND UNDER ALL CIRCUMSTANCES , NEVERTHELESS WHAT THE HONBLE UNION GOVT HAS THE INBUILT POLICY TOWARDS THE RETIREES UNDER THE PROVIDENT FUND ACT .


 It is a CHOKED AND DISHEARTENED VOICE CALL of the retirees of private and public enterprises undergoing the untold sufferings of livelihood for it's maintenance with grave economic insecurity with the pension in the range of less than Rs 1000 and not much above Rs 2500 under the employees pension scheme 1995 FOR a complete JUSTICE to have a LIVABLE AND NORMAL LIFE , in the situation of unsupported of children in nuclear family system of the present days , constrained with present cost of livelihood that is anybody's guess .THE SCALE OF DAMAGE DONE TO THE POOR AND VERY POOR PENSIONERS SUFFERING FOR BASIC NEEDS IN LIVELIHOOD IS UNIMAGINABLE TO BE FOUND VISIBLY NOTICEABLE WHEN THEY ARE LOOKED AT IN THEIR ACTUAL POSITION.

It is the most brazen violation of right to life disrespecting it . There is a total lack of consideration for the lives of Retirees deprived of minimum socio- economic security against the contribution made to the pension fund under the provident fund Act . 


It is the voice of EPS 1995 pensioners and non pensioners majority of whom are not better educated and not economically advantaged living under trying situations accounting in lakhs together worked in small medium and big industries with lower wages of their time to be kindly heard for determination of fair and livable pension that serves it's purpose to meet just minimum cost of life of the day that runs in order of about Rs 10000 , an average minimum cost of life across the country for necessary directions to the hon'ble central govt for protection of minimum economic security for basic survival , given the position that the hon'ble central govt has maintained "a rather Stoic silence " and been answer less logically and the govts of the past that did not make attempts to find an implementable and successful solutions , remained insensitive with no remedial action for redress al of greivences of lakhs of pensioners spread across the country for long period of decades and not acknowledged the human crises , not containing it and not recognizing the Universal right to livelihood and right to health care despite much displeasure , mental torture and unrest growing more and more over the time , expressed in memorandums being submitted continuously and exhibited through their meetings conducted from District levels to the National capital new Delhi with Satyagrahas of chain hunger strike followed by one day hunger strike by all the pensioners settled across the country . No problem exists without it's solution .


More importantly whatever benefit it may be , if the pensioners get it through hike of minimum pension or on actual wages it is consumed for the needs that yield tax to the govt , not turning into black money 

 It does not auger well that the senior , very senior citizens of this democratic country are in turmoil under stressed conditions with bad economic insecurity after service. Some honble members of parliament , being the real representatives of citizens have rightly spoken about the pension problem and demanded for hike of minimum Pension to the EPS 95 pensioners for protection of economic security with sensitivity and humanity concern .

Even the Honble national human rights commission has not addressed the issue for HIKE of MINIMUM PENSION despite having been brought it to it's kind knowledge for violation of human rights in respect of EPS 1995 pensioners drawing meagre pension more than two years back although the issue is very much related to it for rendering justice regardless of the strength of aggreived desolate senior very senior citizens .


 Since inception of the EPS 1995 , no govt of the day that came into power never noticed with sensitiveness as to what has been happening to the EPS 95 pensioners in their livilihood with the meagre pension provided .What has been repeatedly put , time and again is that the system of pension is based on Defined contribution -Defined benefit social security scheme not index or inflation linked remaining stagnant through out until and unless benefit accrues through actuarial valuation of the contribution fund . Resultantly the story is before all the pensioners being faced with it's consequences of economic insecurity for the past more than 25 years . 

 The EPS 1995 of defined contribution -defined benefit not index or inflation linked is designed providing the very meagre pension that creates sever economic insecurity to the pensioners taking away the lives of the pensioners with untold and unspeakable hardships . The concerned authorities continues to be not inclined for revamping this PENSION scheme with immediate hike of minimum pension , despite the reports of parliamentary committee/ committee of 31 hon'ble members of parliament on labour issue in support of hike of minimum pension . Lakhs of pensioners are dieing by degress with injustice of exploitation under unspeakable circumstances and still the issue hangs .


   The hon'ble supreme court held as THE LAST HOPE and TRUST of the citizens aggrieved of injustice has to advise the hon'ble govt for necessary course of action by granting them the relief through hike of minimum Pension with constitutional obligations that addresses the problem as they approach it exhausting the options .

   If the hon'ble highest judiciary of the nation and the hon'ble central govt as well do not decide , at the need of hour , the fate of these retirees crying for just survival with basic needs to be met with by fair minimum pension , being as an important , sensitive and most urgent matter to be addressed , then where would they go deserves to be thought with conscience .

   The senior , very senior citizen EPS 1995 pensioners and also non pensioners need the life protection under the provisions of rights guaranteed in the constitution valuing our contribution made in prime life that led to the growth of the nation . 


Therefore the retirees under the provident fund Act sincerely request the hon'ble supreme court to render the kind justice urgently for providing minimum economic security by moderate fair minimum pension indexed with inflation cost that serves it's purpose in present cost of life alongside the cases of EPS 1995 for kind dispensation of justice .

Sir , we would expect with very much hope that our problem that warrants urgent necessary action by the hon'ble govt , would kindly be solved by your honour .

With very high regards ,

Sincerely your's 

ShamRao , national secretary 

EPS 1995 pensioners coordination committee ,

Bidar , Karnataka .


 

VERY IMP PRESS RELEASE FOR EPS 95 MINIMUM PENSION HIKE 7500, FREE MEDICAL FACILITIES, HIGHER PENSION

EPS95 National Agitation Committee (NAC)

Press note


We all are senior citizens of the country, EPS 95 pensioners.

67 lakh EPS 95 pensioners of India who have paid Rs. 417/-, Rs.541/- and Rs.1250/- per month in the service period of 30 to 35 years to be deposited in the Pension Fund, the present value of which is Rs. 15 to 20 lakhs, he is getting only 500 to 3000 rupees pension for social security.

It is absolutely impossible for two older people to live respectfully in this sign.


The Employees' Provident Fund Organization had published an official advertisement on 7.01.1996 stating that the EPS 95 pension would be 10% or more profitable than the government pension. Also the Employees' Provident Fund Organization had promised to evaluate the pension along with the price index every three years or earlier. It was then promised that the employees' capital would be returned to their nominees after their death. However, none of the promises were followed by the Employees' Provident Fund Organization.

The return on capital was unilaterally withdrawn in 2008. In 2014, he changed 12 months average salary to 60 months average salary based on pension calculation, reducing the amount of pension.


According to the report of Bhagat Singh Koshyari Committee in the year 2013 on the issue of minimum pension, it is recommended to link it with inflation. However, nothing has been implemented in this regard.

In the year 2014 Hon'ble Prime Minister announced a Minimum pension of Rs 1000/- but most of the pensioners are still deprived of the benefit of that.

Employees' Provident Fund Organization is continuously doing injustice to EPS95 pensioners.


In its judgment dated 4.10.2016, the Supreme Court ordered to give higher pension on actual pay. The Employees' Provident Fund Organization had also accepted this decision and issued a circular dated 23.3.2017 but taking a 'U' turn, they issued an interim advisory dated 31.5.2017, in which the pensioners so-called Exempted The pensioners of the institutions were forced to go to court.

To fight this injustice, 95 pensioners of EPS from across the country have formed an organization under the leadership of Commander Ashok Raut under the name "Rashtriya Sangharsh Samiti".

The organization is active in 27 states of the country. To fight this injustice, NAC pushed from heel to top, organized thousands of agitations all over the country including big fronts and dharnas in Delhi.


mother. After the assurance of the Labor Minister and on appeal, all the agitations have been withdrawn, but in front of the District Magistrate's office in Buldhana (Maharashtra), NAC's headquarters, a gradual fast is going on since 24.12.2018 and today is the 889th day of this fasting movement.

NAC leaders called on Hon'ble Prime Minister on 4th March 2020. mother. The Prime Minister assured the NAC leaders of resolving the issue on a war footing. More than a year has passed since then but nothing happened. Hence, tremendous anger/ outrage is being witnessed among the aged pensioners and their families.


Helpless Senior Citizen With great hope, Mr. Looking up to the Prime Minister as the decision will affect his life with dignity. mother. A nationwide fasting day program has been organized on 01.06.2021 to remember the fulfillment of the promise given by him to the Prime Minister.

EPS 95 Pensioners Demands are as follows:-

1. Minimum monthly pension of Rs.7500 and dearness allowance should be given thereon.

2. The Interim Advisory dated 31st May 2017 of the Employees' Provident Fund Organization should be withdrawn and EPS 95 to the pensioners. The option of higher pension should be given according to the order of the Supreme Court and the circular of EPFO dated 23.03.2017


3. Provide free medical facilities to all EPS 95 pensioners and their spouses.

4. EPS 95 Retired employees who are not members of the EPS 95 scheme should be allowed ex post membership by recovering the contribution along with interest and allowing them proper dues otherwise they would be entitled to pension of Rs. 5000/- per month can be fixed



Wednesday, June 2, 2021

EPS 95 Latest News: EPS 95 Pensioners 1 Day Hunger Strike Successful , Minimumu Pension Hike 7500+DA, Free Medical Facilities, Higher Pension

Respected Honorable Prime Minister,

Elected Representative of Lok Sabha,


On behalf of 67lakhs EPS-95 Pensioners all over India observed a 1 day hunger strike today from 08 AM to 5pm to press our pending demand of hike in minimum pension.

Glimpses of photo are attached for perusal.


QUR DEMAND:

MINIMUM PENSION OF INR. 7,500/- PER MONTH.

FREE MEDICAL FACILITIES.

Hundreds of senior citizens in this category are suffering for minimum living standards and quality of life due to meagre monthly income of less than INR.500/-


We are confident that our elected sensitive Government under the able leadership of Prime Minister Shri Narendra Modi ji will resolve the issue on top priority and save old life in this heavenly Bharat Bhumi.

The starvation, suffering and sickness of this EPS-95 Pensioners category in this great country is serious than the current prevailing Pandemic.


I on behalf of the country man and women with folded hands pray the responsible authorities to consider the legitimate demand.

Regards

Baburay Naik

Ex- Executive, Goa Shipyard Ltd.

Vasco Da Gama, Goa 403802.



 






1-6-2021 को माननीय अध्यक्ष महोदय कमाण्डर अशोक जी राऊत के आव्हान पर सुबह 8बजे शाम 5बजे तक पत्नी सहित उपवास किया ।एक हजार पेन्शन मे रोज उपवास होता ही हे पर आदरणीय मोदी जी को वादा याद दिलाना भी जरूरी हे ।एन ए सी जिन्दाबाद ।


 

Sunday, May 30, 2021

EPS 95 Pension Hike Latest News: Very Important meeting finish on EPS 95 Pension 7500+Hike+DA, Medical Facilities, Higher Pension, See Details Now

Meeting held on 29 May 2021 the meeting was organised at Bangalore by Mr Ramakant, master Manjunath and other core committee members of Karnataka state NAC.


THE MAIN POINT DISCUSSED TODAY, WAS THAT THE AGITATION OF FASTING ON 1ST JUNE BY ALL EPS PENSIONERS SHOULD BE MADE SUCCESS AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL IN ORDER TO DRAW ATTENTION OF PRIME MINISTER AND GOVERNMENT OF INDIA SEEKING JUSTICE TO THE EPS 95 PENSIONERS WHO ARE DRAWING MEAGRE PENSION OF 1000 ONLY WHICH IS NOT SUFFICIENT FOR THE LIVELIHOOD OF PENSIONER AND SPOUSE.


IMPORTANCE OF PROVIDING MEDICAL FACILITIES THROUGH ESI CORPORATION TO ALL PENSIONERS IS DISCUSSED AT LENGTH. BECAUSE OF CORONA THERE IS IMMEDIATE NEED OF MEDICAL CARE TO ALL EPS 95 PENSIONERS.

EPF PENSION HIKE NEWS: EPFO Pension News PM Narendra Modi Big Announcement for Family Pension Under EPFO, Pension Under EPFO Increased by Govt.

EPFO Pension News, Family Pension सरकारी या प्राइवेट नौकरी करने वालों के लिए महत्‍वपूर्ण खबर है। केंद्र सरकार ने उनके हित से जुड़ा बड़ा और प्रभावी फैसला लिया है। अब परिवार में कोविड के चलते कमाने वाले सदस्‍य की मौत पर फैमिली पेंशन, बीमा राशि के साथ ही आर्थिक सहायता दी जाएगी। प्रधानमंत्री नरेंद्र मोदी ने ट्वीट कर इसकी जानकारी दी है। पीएम मोदी ने कहा- ईएसआईसी और ईपीएफओ के तहत पारिवारिक पेंशन- कर्मचारी जमा लिंक्ड बीमा योजना उन परिवारों को वित्तीय सहायता प्रदान करेगी, जिन्होंने कोरोना वायरस महामारी के कारण अपने कमाने वाले सदस्य को खो दिया है। भारत सरकार इन परिवारों के साथ एकजुटता के साथ खड़ी है। सरकार ने उन परिवारों की मदद के लिए और उपायों की घोषणा की, जिन्होंने कोविड के कारण कमाने वाले सदस्य को खो दिया। 


केंद्र के ताजा फैसले के अनुसार कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा निगम के तहत कोविड के कारण जान गंवाने वालों के आश्रितों को दी जाने वाली पारिवारिक पेंशन, ईडीएलआई योजना के तहत बीमा लाभों को बढ़ाया गया है। इन योजनाओं से परिवारों के सामने आने वाली वित्तीय कठिनाइयों को कम करने में मदद मिलेगी। इन परिवार के बच्चों के लिए पीएम केयर्स के तहत कोविड प्रभावित बच्चों का अधिकारिता उपाय घोषित किया गया है।


भारत सरकार ने उन परिवारों की मदद करने के लिए और उपायों की घोषणा की है, जिन्होंने कोविड के कारण कमाई करने वाले सदस्य को खो दिया है। वे कोविड के कारण मरने वालों के परिवारों को पेंशन और एक बढ़ाया और उदार बीमा मुआवजा प्रदान करेंगे। पीएम ने कहा कि उनकी सरकार उनके परिवारों के साथ खड़ी है। उन्होंने यह भी कहा कि इन योजनाओं के माध्यम से उनके सामने आने वाली वित्तीय कठिनाइयों को कम करने का प्रयास किया जा रहा है।

Family Pension under ESIC and EPFO- Employees’ Deposit Linked Insurance Scheme will provide a financial cushion to those families who have lost their earning member due to COVID-19. GOI stands in solidarity with these families.


कर्मचारी राज्य बीमा निगम (ESIC) के तहत पारिवारिक पेंशन

परिवार को सम्मान का जीवन जीने और जीवन स्तर को अच्छा बनाए रखने में मदद करने के लिए, ईएसआईसी पेंशन योजना का लाभ रोजगार से संबंधित मृत्यु के मामलों में उन लोगों तक भी पहुंचाया जा रहा है जिनकी मृत्यु कोविड के कारण हुई है। ऐसे व्यक्तियों के आश्रित परिवार के सदस्य मौजूदा मानदंडों के अनुसार कर्मचारी द्वारा लिए गए औसत दैनिक वेतन के 90% के बराबर पेंशन के लाभ के हकदार होंगे। यह लाभ पूर्वव्यापी प्रभाव से 24.03.2020 से और ऐसे सभी मामलों के लिए 24.03.2022 तक उपलब्ध होगा।


कर्मचारी भविष्य निधि संगठन- कर्मचारी जमा लिंक्ड बीमा योजना (EDLI)

ईडीएलआई योजना के तहत बीमा लाभों को बढ़ाया और उदार बनाया गया है। अन्य सभी लाभार्थियों के अलावा, यह विशेष रूप से उन कर्मचारियों के परिवारों की मदद करेगा जिन्होंने COVID के कारण अपनी जान गंवाई है। अधिकतम बीमा लाभ की राशि ₹6 लाख से बढ़ाकर ₹7 लाख कर दी गई है। ₹ 2.5 लाख के न्यूनतम बीमा लाभ का प्रावधान बहाल कर दिया गया है और अगले तीन वर्षों के लिए 15 फरवरी 2020 से भूतलक्षी प्रभाव से लागू होगा।


संविदा/अनौपचारिक श्रमिकों के परिवारों को लाभान्वित करने के लिए, केवल एक प्रतिष्ठान में निरंतर रोजगार की शर्त को उदार बनाया गया है, यहां तक ​​कि उन कर्मचारियों के परिवारों को भी लाभ उपलब्ध कराया जा रहा है, जिन्होंने अपनी मृत्यु से पहले पिछले 12 महीनों में नौकरी बदली हो। इन योजनाओं के विस्तृत दिशा-निर्देश श्रम एवं रोजगार मंत्रालय द्वारा जारी किए जा रहे हैं।


 

Saturday, May 29, 2021

EPS 95 Pension Hike Latest News: Very Important meeting on EPS 95 Pension 7500+Hike+DA, Medical Facilities, Higher Pension today. Join meeting see joining details now

*National Agitation Committee, (EPS'95) Karnataka*

Dear NAC members,
NAC Karnataka has planned *one Day* (fasting at home)hunger strike programme on 1st June '21 by all EPS'95 Pensioners all over the nation.

*Please share this message to all EPS'95 Pensioners groups*

To understand modalities we have planned *Zoom meeting on 29.5.21 at 5pm- 6pm*
Join Zoom Meeting

Meeting ID: 517 464 7690
Passcode: 6xc4ED

Points to be discussed in Zoom meeting:
1. Organising ONE DAY hunger strike on 01.06.'21
2. As per the directions of NAC actions to be implemented.
3. Any clarification on hunger strike and reporting attendance.

All Karnataka NAC EPS'95 Pensioners are requested to attend the Zoom meeting to discuss and share your inputs.

Warm Regards
NAC Karnataka 
Coordinating Committee

Monday, May 10, 2021

EPS 95 Minimum Pension Hike Latest News: Very IMP Notice to 65 Lakh EPS 95 Pensioners Regarding EPS 95 Minimum Pension Hike 7500+da, Free Medical Facilities, Higher Pension

National Agitation Committee: -

NAC's next Agitation Programme:-

1. Contact Campaign from Home

2. Formation of Tehsil level organization

3. Nation wide "One Day Fast"on Dtd.01.06.2021


Respected brothers and sisters,

We all are aware about the indications we received regarding our demands getting approved by the Government in the last budget session.However, it is clearly visible that the obstacles due to the Corona epidemic and mainly due to the unjust behavior of the cruel EPFO we could not achieve our goal.

We all, including our leaders, have done the great job of conveying the voice of pensioners and the truthful views to the Government and to all the concerned officials through protest day from 06.04.2021 by submitting memorandum to the *Hon. Prime Minister / Chairman CBT at all the EPFO  ​​offices in the country.


You all are aware that all the teams of our organization are working effectively on their own front and today is 869 th Day of Chain hunger strike at NAC,HQ Buldhana in front of the Collector office.

You all are also aware that the corona epidemic came from only last year but as far our pensioners are concerned, the EPS 95 pension epidemic had already been started for the last several years. in all these innumerable years our pensioner colleagues are dieing at the rate of around 5000 per month. In CORONA this rate has been increased many folds.


In view of the tremendous anger about the cruel EPFO ​​among all the EPS 95 members and the increasing death rate of our pensioners, a target has been set to fulfill all our four major demands on or before the forthcoming monsoon session of Parliament.

In order to achieve this goal, all the members and all the leaders are requested to pay special attention to the following points/NAC's Agitational movement by keeping yourself,your friends and your familysafe from CORONA:-


  1. Convey our strong feelings about EPS pension through social media / electronic media (Whats App, Twitter, E-mail, SMS, phone contact etc.) effectively to the Hon.Prime Minister, Finance Minister, Labor Minister, MPs,CBT members from your respective regions. According to out previous General Contact Campaign Program, the leaders who were given this responsibility must complete this campaign till the start of the Monsoon Session of Parliament under the guidance of the Chief Coordinator / State President of the respective regions.
  2. Formation of Tehsil level organizations of all the states be completed by 31.05.2021.
  3. One Day fast be observed by all the EPS 95 Pensioners from Home on Dtd. 01.06.2021 in the memories of our Great Members* who passed away and also to remind the Hon.Prime minister once again to fulfill our Demands as per his assurances given on Dtd. 04.03.2020.

Finally , Please be remain safe, be aware of the socio-political situation in the country and organize your respective area to achieve the final goal.

Please remember that you are the representatives of all the 67 lakh poor, helpless members of EPS95. We all need to be the ground level activists. Mind you, many of our members do not even have ordinary phones, we cannot even contact them directly due to this corona epidemic.

Jeshtha Bharat-Shreshtha Bharat

 yours sincerely, 

 Commander Ashok Raut,

 National President


 

EPS 95 Pension Hike News: EPS 95 पेंशन बढ़ोतरी 7500 + DA को लेकर 65 लाख पेंशनधारकों के लिए NAC की जरुरी सूचना

National Agitation Committee

NAC का अगला आंदोलन कार्यक्रम

1. अपने अपने घर से ही सम्पर्क अभियान.
2 सभी राज्यों में तहसील स्तर के संगठन का गठन
3. दिनांक 1 जून 2021 को एक दिन का देश व्यापी उपवास कार्यक्रम


आदरणीय भाइयों एवं बहनों,
आपको विदित ही है कि हमारी मांगों को सरकार द्वारा पिछले अधिवेशन/बजट सत्र में मंजूर करने के संकेत हमें मिल रहे थे लेकिन कोरोना महामारी के चलते व EPFO के अन्यायपूर्ण व्यवहार के कारण इसमें रुकावटें आई है ऐसा स्पष्ट रूप से दिखाई पड़ रहा है.

हम पेंशनर्स की आवाज को व सत्य तत्थ्यों को सरकार तक तथा संबंधितों तक पहुंचाने का कार्य आप सभी,हमारे नेताओं ने दिनांक 06.04.2021 से विरोध दिवस के माध्यम से देश के सभी ईपीएफओ कार्यालयों पर मा. प्रधानमंत्री जी/मा.अध्यक्ष सीबीटी के नाम निवेदन देकर संपन्न किया है.


आप सभी को विदित ही है कि हमारे संगठन की सभी टीमें अपने अपने मोर्चे पर प्रभावशाली रीति से काम रही हैं व NAC के मुख्यालय, बुलढाणा महाराष्ट्र में क्रमिक अनशन का आज 869 वा दिन है. आप सभी को यह भी विदित है कि कोरोना की महामारी तो पिछले वर्ष से आई लेकिन हमारे पेंशनर्स में तो इपीएस 95 पेंशन महामारी* पिछले कई सालों से शुरू है जिसमें प्रति माह लगभग 5000 की दर से हमारे पेंशनर्स भाई बहन संसार से बिदा होते जा रहे थे व अब कोरोना महामारी आने के कारण मृत्युदर और अधिक बढ़ गई है.


सभी सदस्यों में ईपीएफओ के प्रति रोष व पेंशनर्स भाई बहनों की बढ़ती हुई मृत्युदर को देखते हुए , *किसी भी हालत में आने वाले मानसून अधिवेशन में या उसके पहले हमारी चार प्रमुख मांगों को पूर्ण करवाने का लक्ष्य निर्धारित किया गया है. लक्ष्य प्राप्ति के लिए सभी सदस्य व सभी नेताओं से निवेदन है कि स्वयं को व अपने परिजनों को सुरक्षित रखते हुए कृपया निम्नलिखत बिंदुओं /NAC के इस आंदोलन कार्यक्रम पर विशेष ध्यान दीजिए:-


  1. 1.सोशल मीडिया /इलेक्ट्रॉनिक मीडिया के माध्यम से (व्हाट्सएप, ट्विटर, ई मेल, एसएमएस, फोन से संपर्क आदि) अपनी आवाज को प्रभावशाली ढंग से मा.प्रधानमंत्री, मा.वित्त मंत्री, मा.श्रम मंत्री, अपने अपने क्षेत्र के मा.सांसद व सीबीटी सदस्यों तक पहुंचाने का कार्यक्रम. पिछले महासंपर्क अभियान के अनुसार जिन नेताओं को जो जवाबदारी दी गई थी उसी के अनुसार इस अभियान को संसद के मान्सून सत्र के शुरू होने के पहले तक अपने अपने क्षेत्र के मुख्य समन्वयक/प्रांतीय अध्यक्ष के मार्गदर्शन में पूर्ण किया जाए. 
  2. 2.दिनांक 31.05.2021 तक सभी राज्यों के तहसील स्तर के संगठन का गठन करना.
  3. 3. जो महान सदस्य हमें छोड़कर संसार से बिदा हो गए उनकी स्मृति में व मा. प्रधानमंत्री जी द्वारा दिनांक 04.03.2020 को पेंशनर्स की मांगों को पूर्ण करने हेतु, दिए गए वचन पूर्ति की एक बार फिर से याद दिलाने के लिए दिनांक 01.06.2021 को सभी ईपीएस 95 द्वारा अपने अपने घर से देश व्यापी उपवास कार्यक्रम.

कृपया सुरक्षित रहिए,लक्ष्य प्राप्ति के लिए जागरूक रहिए व संगठित रहिए. कृपया याद रहे कि आप सभी उन सदस्यों के प्रतिनिधि हैं, जो हमारे संगठन के ग्राउंड स्तर के कार्यकर्ता भाई बहन है व जिनके पास तो साधारण फोन भी नहीं हैं ,इस कोरोना महामारी के चलते हम उनसे प्रत्यक्ष संपर्क भी नहीं कर सकते हैं.
जेष्ठ भारत-श्रेष्ठ भारत

आपका अपना,

कमांडर अशोक राऊत,
राष्ट्रीय अध्यक्ष


 

Sunday, May 2, 2021

Good News For EPS 95 Pensioners: Kerala High Court Dismisses Review Petition Filed By EPFO & CBT, Kerala High Court Order


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V

THURSDAY, THE 08TH DAY OF APRIL 2021 / 18TH CHAITHRA, 1943

RP. No. 267 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 26944/2019

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 26944/2019(P) OF HIGH COURT OF KERALA

REVIEW PETITIONER/RESPONDENTS 2 & 3 IN WPC:

1. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION,  REPRESENTED BY THE CENTRAL PROVIDENT COMMISSIONER, BHAVISYA NIDHI BHAVAN, 14, BHIKAJI CAMA PALACE, NEW DELHI-110 066

2. REGIONAL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER, EPF ORGANISATION, SUB REGIONAL OFFICE, BHAVISHYANIDHI BHAVAN, KALOOR, COCHIN-682 017


BY ADV. SRI.SAJEEV KUMAR K.GOPAL

RESPONDENTS/PETITIONER 1 & RESPONDENTS 1 & 4 IN WPC:

1 T. RADHAKRISHNAN,  S/O. LATE THANKAPPAN ASARI, NEERCHALIL HOUSE, MANATHUPADOM ROAD, UNICHIRA, ERNAKULAM-682 033, (P.F.NO.KR/2729/175)(PPO NO.KR/ KCH/ 00083431)

2 UNION OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND EMPLOYMENT, GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, SHRAM SHAKTI BHAVAN, RAFI MMARG, NEW DELHI-110 001

3 ERNAKULAM REGIONAL CO-OPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD. NO.E-150 (D),REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, HEAD OFFICE EDAPPALLY, COCHIN-682 024

SRI K SUDHINKUMAR, SC


THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 08.04.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

ORDER

This Review Petition is preferred seeking review of the judgment dated 18.2.2020 in W.P.(C) No.26944 of 2019. 

2. I have heard Sri. Sajeev Kumar K. Gopal, the learned counsel appearing for the review petitioner and Sri. Prakash M.P., the learned counsel appearing for the party respondent.

3. It is by now settled that review of a judgment is permitted only when it is shown that the judgment suffers from any error apparent on the face of the record.


4. The contention advanced by the petitioner while seeking review of the judgment, is that though the challenge raised by the EPFO to the judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in Sasikumar P. V. Union of India and Ors.1 was repelled by the Apex Court in SLP(C) No.8658-8659 of 2019, a review petition filed against the judgment was entertained by the Apex Court and the same is pending. It is also submitted that the Central Government has also preferred an appeal and the same is pending. It is further submitted that their Lordships of the Division Bench in the judgment dated 21.12.2020 in W.A.No.944/2020 had expressed doubts about the correctness of Sasikumar (supra). According to the petitioner, as this Court in the judgment under Review placed profused reliance on Sasikumar (supra), due to the aforesaid reasons, the judgment is to be reviewed.


5. I have considered the submissions advanced.

6. The power of review may be exercised on the discovery of new and important matter or evidence which, after the exercise of due diligence was not within the knowledge of the person seeking the review or could not be produced by him at the time when the order was made; it may be exercised where some mistake or error apparent on the face of the record is found; it may also be exercised on any analogous ground. But, it may not be exercised on the ground that the decision was erroneous on merits. That would be the province of a court of appeal. A power of review is not to be confused with appellate powers which may enable an appellate court to correct all manner of errors committed by the subordinate court.

7. In Haridas Das vs. Usha Rani Banik (Smt.) and Others2, while considering the scope and ambit of Section 114 CPC read with Order 47 Rule 1 CPC it is observed and the Apex Court had occasion to hold as follows in paragraph 13 to 18 as under:


“ 13. In order to appreciate the scope of a review, Section 114 CPC has to be read, but this section does not even adumbrate the ambit of interference expected of the court since it merely states that it ‘may make such order thereon as it thinks fit’. The parameters are prescribed in Order 47 CPC and for the purposes of this lis, permit the defendant to press for a rehearing ‘on account of some mistake or error apparent on the face of the records or for any other sufficient reason’. The former part of the rule deals with a situation attributable to the applicant, and the latter to a jural action which is manifestly incorrect or on which two conclusions are not possible. Neither of them postulate a rehearing of the dispute because a party had not highlighted all the aspects of the case or could perhaps have argued them more forcefully and/or cited binding precedents to the court and thereby enjoyed a favourable verdict. This is amply evident from the Explanation to Rule 1 of Order 47 which states that the fact that the decision on a question of law on which then judgment of the court is based has been reversed or modified by the subsequent decision of a superior court in any other case, shall not be a ground for the review of such judgment. Where the order in question is appealable the aggrieved party has adequate and efficacious remedy and the court should exercise the power to review its order with the greatest circumspection.


14. In Meera Bhanja v. Nirmala Kumari Choudhury, [(1995) 1 SCC 170] it was held that:

“8. It is well settled that the review proceedings are not by way of an appeal and have to be strictly confined to the scope and ambit of Order 47 Rule 1 CPC. In connection with the limitation of the powers of the court under Order 47 Rule 1, while dealing with similar jurisdiction available to the High Court while seeking to review the orders under Article 226 of the Constitution, this Court, in Aribam Tuleshwar Sharma v. Aribam Pishak Sharma, (1979) 4 SCC 389 speaking through Chinnappa Reddy, J. has made the following pertinent observations:

‘It is true there is nothing in Article 226 of the Constitution to preclude the High Court from exercising the power of review which inheres in every court of plenary jurisdiction to prevent miscarriage of justice or to correct grave and palpable errors committed by it. But, there are definitive limits to the exercise of the power of review. The power of review may be exercised on the discovery of new and important matter or evidence which, after the exercise of due diligence was not within the knowledge of the person seeking the review or could not be produced by him at the time when the order was made; it may be exercised where some mistake or error apparent on the face of the record is found, it may also be exercised on any analogous ground. But, it may not be exercised on the ground that the decision was erroneous on merits. That would be the province of a court of appeal. A power of review is not to be confused with appellate power which may enable an appellate court to correct all manner of errors committed by the subordinate court.’” 

15. A perusal of Order 47 Rule 1 shows that review of a judgment or an order could be sought: (a) from the discovery of new and important matters or evidence which after the exercise of due diligence was not within the knowledge of the applicant; (b) such important matter or evidence could not be produced by the applicant at the time when the decree was passed or order made; and (c) on account of some mistake or error apparent on the face of the record or any other sufficient reason.


16. In Aribam Tuleshwar Sharma v. Aribam Pishak Sharma, AIR 1979 SC 1047, this Court held that there are definite limits to the exercise of power of review. In that case, an application under Order 47 Rule 1 read with Section 151 of the Code was filed which was allowed and the order passed by the Judicial Commissioner was set aside and the writ petition was dismissed. On an appeal to this Court it was held as under: (SCC p. 390, para 3) “It is true as observed by this Court in Shivdeo Singh v. State of Punjab, AIR 1963 SC 1909 there is nothing in Article 226 of the Constitution to preclude a High Court from exercising the power of review which inheres in every court of plenary jurisdiction to prevent miscarriage of justice or to correct grave and palpable errors committed by it. But, there are definitive limits to the exercise of the power of review. The power of review may be exercised on the discovery of new and important matter or evidence which, after the exercise of due diligence was not within the knowledge of the person seeking the review or could not be produced by him at the time when the order was made; it may be exercised where some mistake or error apparent on the face of the record is found; it may also be exercised on any analogous ground. But, it may not be exercised on the ground that the decision was erroneous on merits. That would be the province of a court of appeal. A power of review is not to be confused with appellate powers which may enable an appellate court to correct all manner of errors committed by the subordinate court.”


17. The judgment in Aribam case has been followed in Meera Bhanja. In that case, it has been reiterated that an error apparent on the face of the record for acquiring jurisdiction to review must be such an error which may strike one on a mere looking at the record and would not require any long drawn process of reasoning. The following observations in connection with an error apparent on the face of the record in Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde v. Millikarjun Bhavanappa Tirumale, AIR 1960 SC 137 were also noted: “An error which has to be established by a long drawn process of reasoning on points where there may conceivably be two opinions can hardly be said to be an error apparent on the face of the record. Where an alleged error is far from self evident and if it can be established, it has to be established, by lengthy and complicated arguments, such an error cannot be cured by a writ of certiorari according to the rule governing the powers of the superior court to issue such a writ.”


8. The petitioner has not been able to show that there is any error manifest on the face of the order. What is contended is that proceedings are pending before superior courts and in that view of the matter, the judgment ought to be reviewed. It is settled that while considering an application for review, the court must confine its adjudication with regard to the material which was available at the time of initial decision. The happening of some subsequent event or development cannot be taken note of for declaring the initial order/decision as vitiated by an error apparent. It is also settled that review is not maintainable on the basis of a subsequent decision/judgment of a co-ordinate or larger bench of the court or of a superior court. A review petition can by no means be an appeal in disguise.


Having considered the matter in all perspectives, I find that the petitioner has not made out any grounds for review. This review petition will stand dismissed. 

Sd/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V 

NS JUDGE